Skip to main content

    Operating Model

    Towards a trading partnership,
    not a reporting relationship

    This is the direction we are building towards with every client. Not just execution, but a genuine commercial partnership where performance is measured by profit, decisions are shared, and both sides know what good looks like.

    "The ambition is clear: strategy led by you, developed in collaboration with us, and executed in partnership."

    Ownership & Accountability

    Where we think ownership should sit

    This is the ownership model we are working towards. The principle is simple: you set the commercial direction, we translate it into channel strategy and deliver against it. The detail evolves with each client relationship.

    Area
    You Own
    We Own
    Commercial Direction
    Budget, targets, margin guardrails
    Translating into channel strategy and execution
    Channel Strategy
    Input, alignment, and sign-off
    Audience design, campaign structure, test roadmap
    Execution
    Creative approvals where needed
    Full campaign management and optimisation
    Reporting
    Defining KPIs and priorities
    Delivering clear, decision-ready insight
    Measurement
    Access to data inputs
    Interpreting performance, incrementality, and impact

    Measurement & Success

    The metrics we believe matter most

    We are increasingly moving towards tracking what your finance team cares about, not what Google's dashboard defaults to. These are the metrics we think should earn their place in every report.

    POAS

    True efficiency after cost. The only metric that tells you whether spend is generating profit.

    New Customer CAC

    True acquisition cost. What you actually pay to win a customer who would not have found you otherwise.

    Customer Quality

    Repeat behaviour matters more than volume. A customer who buys once at a discount is not the same as one who returns.

    Existing Customer Mix

    Shows whether paid is reactivating lapsed customers (incremental) or over-targeting active ones (non-incremental).

    Contribution Margin

    Commercial truth. Revenue means nothing if the margin structure does not support it.

    Incrementality

    Growth that would not have happened otherwise. The question every finance team eventually asks.

    Communication Cadence

    Where reporting is heading

    The goal is reporting that your team can take directly into a leadership discussion without additional work. This is the standard we are building towards across every engagement.

    Weekly

    Trading Call

    Decision-focused session covering performance, actions taken, and what happens next. Designed so you can take this directly into a leadership discussion without additional work.

    Weekly

    Decision-Ready Report

    Not a summary. A decision-making tool. Performance with YoY and forecast context, POAS as primary metric, new vs. existing customer breakdown, and contribution margin trajectory.

    Weekly

    'What We Are Doing Next'

    The most important section. 3-5 clear, owned actions tied directly to performance. No vague 'we will monitor' language. Specific, accountable, measurable.

    Monthly

    Strategic Review

    Deeper performance analysis against commercial targets. Incrementality findings, customer quality trends, and strategic recommendations for the period ahead.

    Quarterly

    Commercial Health Check

    Full review of contribution margin, CAC trends, customer mix, and channel incrementality. The kind of analysis you would take to a board meeting.

    What we aim to include weekly

    • Channel performance with YoY and vs. forecast context
    • POAS as primary metric (ROAS shown for context only)
    • New customer acquisition: volume, CAC, and early quality signals
    • Existing customer breakdown: reactivated (incremental) vs. active/loyal (non-incremental)
    • Clear view on where paid drives growth vs. captures demand you would have converted organically
    • Contribution margin trajectory
    • Creative performance: what is scaling, declining, and being tested next

    What we are moving away from

    • ×Descriptive reporting that narrates numbers without recommendations
    • ×Platform metrics without commercial context
    • ×Reports that require interpretation before use
    • ×Dashboards that need a training session to read
    • ×Updates from people who do not know your account

    How We Structure Activity

    The direction: structure around customer state

    We are increasingly moving away from structuring campaigns around what Google recommends and towards organising activity by where the customer is in their journey and whether spend creates genuinely incremental value.

    Priority areas

    • New customer acquisition

      True incrementality. Customers who would not have found you without paid activity.

    • Lapsed customer reactivation

      High-value segment. Customers who already know you but need a reason to return.

    • Controlled retargeting

      Not over-reliance. No wasted spend on audiences who would convert anyway.

    What we actively avoid

    • ×

      Over-investment in branded activity

      Brand campaigns that cannibalise organic traffic at £6k+/month are common. We test and prove true incrementality before committing budget.

    • ×

      Paying for intent you already own

      If a customer would have converted organically, paying Google to claim the attribution is not growth. It is a tax.

    • ×

      Platform-objective-led structuring

      Google wants you to maximise conversions. We want you to maximise contribution margin. These are not the same thing.

    Built to prove value, not lock you in

    We use a short initial period to demonstrate methodology, then move to rolling terms. If the relationship is not working, you can leave. The structure is designed to earn your continued business, not trap it.

    Initial period

    Fixed-term methodology implementation to prove the approach works

    After that

    Rolling monthly with 30-day notice. You stay because it works, not because you are locked in.

    Structured check-ins

    30, 60, and 90-day review points against agreed commercial targets

    Reporting standards

    Weekly reporting format agreed before contract starts and included in scope

    Senior involvement

    Embedded in weekly cadence and strategy discussions. Not limited to quarterly reviews.

    Interested in where this is heading?

    If this kind of partnership model sounds like what you are looking for, let us have a conversation about how it could work for your business.