Skip to main content
    March 20267 min read

    Your Loyalty Programme Should Change How You Bid

    You've invested in building a loyalty programme. Thousands of members, repeat purchase incentives, points systems, early access perks. But your Google Ads bidding treats loyalty members the same as cold traffic. You're paying acquisition CPCs for customers you already own.

    The Loyalty Blind Spot

    Most ecommerce accounts blend all customers into one audience. A loyalty member searching for your brand name gets the same bid as a first-time visitor. But their economics are completely different:

    • • Loyalty members have already been acquired - their CAC is zero for this purchase
    • • Their conversion rate is 3-5x higher than new visitors
    • • Their AOV is typically 15-25% higher
    • • They would likely have purchased through direct or email channels without the paid click

    Every click you pay for on a loyalty member is potentially wasted spend - money spent acquiring a customer who was already coming back. This is the same principle behind suppressing existing customers in Shopping.

    Member vs Non-Member Economics

    Calculate these numbers for your account:

    • Loyalty member CPA: What you're paying per conversion for loyalty members clicking on ads
    • Incremental value: How many loyalty member purchases via ads would have happened anyway through other channels
    • Cannibalisation rate: The percentage of loyalty member ad clicks that cannibalise organic, direct, or email conversions
    • True incremental CPA: After removing cannibalised conversions, what is the real cost per truly incremental loyalty purchase

    In our experience, 40-60% of loyalty member clicks on branded search would have converted through other channels. That's your cannibalisation rate - and it represents pure waste.

    Bid Adjustment Logic

    The approach depends on your campaign type and objective:

    • Brand campaigns: Exclude loyalty members entirely. They'll find you through direct/bookmarks/email.
    • Shopping (acquisition): Negative audience exclusion for loyalty members. Don't pay to acquire existing customers.
    • Shopping (retention): Separate campaign targeting loyalty members with lower ROAS targets (since their LTV justifies the spend)
    • PMax: Use audience signals to deprioritise loyalty members, though exclusion control is limited

    Audience Segmentation Setup

    The technical implementation requires clean data:

    • • Upload loyalty member emails via Customer Match (weekly refresh minimum)
    • • Segment by loyalty tier if your programme has tiers (Gold, Silver, Bronze behave differently)
    • • Create separate lists for active members (purchased in last 90 days) vs dormant members
    • • Dormant loyalty members may warrant reactivation campaigns with specific budgets

    This is first-party data strategy in action - using your own customer data to make bidding commercially intelligent.

    Suppression vs Investment

    Not all loyalty members should be suppressed. The decision framework:

    • Active members (purchased recently): Suppress from acquisition campaigns. They're coming back anyway.
    • Dormant members (90+ days since purchase): Target with reactivation campaigns. They need a nudge.
    • High-value members: Consider competitive defence campaigns if competitors are bidding on your brand terms
    • About-to-lapse members: Worth investing in via targeted remarketing with loyalty-specific offers

    Measuring Loyalty Impact

    Run a holdout test to measure the real incremental impact of ads on loyalty members. Suppress ads for 20% of your loyalty audience for 30 days and compare purchase rates. The difference is your true incremental value - everything else is cannibalisation.

    Next Steps

    We use cookies to improve your experience. Privacy Policy